Buyer profile
ORASUL CHITILA (CONSILIUL LOCAL CHITILA)
Every award we hold where this buyer named a supplier, in RO322, Romania, from 22 Jul 2011 to 13 Aug 2026— with what is open now and what ends soon.
Awards
20
naming a supplier
Attributed value
€14.6m + RON 123.0m
7 shared, unvalued
Suppliers
22
awarded to
Active
2011–2026
first to latest award
Open right now
Notices from this buyer still open for bids, soonest deadline first. Each links to the buyer's own notice; deadlines are as published.
Contracts ending soon
Awards whose notice published a contract end date in the next eighteen months, among awards published in the last 5 years. A notice without an end date is not listed — nothing is inferred.
None of this buyer's recent award notices published a contract end date inside the window.
Awards by year
Who they award to
| Supplier | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| GARDEN CENTER GRUP S.R.L. | 3 | not attributable |
| RO-VERDE LANDSCAPING S.R.L. | 3 | not attributable |
| COMPANIA ROMPREST SERVICE S.A. | 2 | €2.1m + RON 15.5m |
| INMEDICA SMART SOLUTIONS | 2 | RON 500k |
| KARSAN OTOMOTIV SANAYI VE TICARET A.S | 2 | RON 98.2m |
| ADVANCE | 1 | not attributable |
| ALTEX ROMANIA | 1 | RON 944k |
| AXA TRANS CONSTRUCT | 1 | not attributable |
| CEC Bank SA | 1 | €4.2m |
| CORVIN DESIGN | 1 | not attributable |
What they buy
Selling to them?
Get this buyer's new notices in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full record behind each award, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. The buyer's published spellings are grouped by case, punctuation and spacing only — this profile holds 2 of them; nothing that could mark a different body is removed, so a council and its housing department, or a trust and its charity, stay separate. An award counts here only where its notice named at least one supplier. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: a supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where one supplier was named. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued; a framework ceiling is never treated as money a supplier won; nothing is estimated. Every currency is reported separately, never summed. Contract end dates are the ones the notice published, looked for among awards published in the last 5 years. The linked source notice is authoritative.