Supplier profile
ADVENT ONE PTY LTD
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 9 Jan 2013 to 17 Jun 2026.
Awards won
23
all time
Attributed value
AUD 1.8m
as published
Buyers
10
public bodies
Active
2013–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Court of Australia | 10 | AUD 805k |
| Family Court and Federal Circuit Court | 4 | AUD 644k |
| Administrative Appeals Tribunal | 2 | AUD 23k |
| Bureau of Meteorology | 1 | AUD 18k |
| Central Queensland University | 1 | AUD 72k |
| Department of Defence | 1 | AUD 17k |
| Federal Circuit Court of Australia | 1 | AUD 48k |
| PSBA | 1 | AUD 66k |
| Queensland Treasury | 1 | AUD 50k |
| eHealth Queensland | 1 | AUD 36k |
What they win
Awards
All 23 awards we hold
- Web Content Manager renewal (2025-2026) ↗Federal Court of Australia£92kawarded 17 Jun 2026
- Contract with ADVENT ONE PTY LTD ↗eHealth Queensland£36kawarded 13 May 2025
- HCL Web Content Manager renewal ↗Federal Court of Australia£69kawarded 1 Nov 2024
- Contract with Advent One Pty Ltd ↗Central Queensland University£72kawarded 25 Oct 2024
- Contract with Advent One Pty Ltd ↗Queensland Treasury£50kawarded 13 Mar 2024
- HCL Web Content manager renewal ↗Federal Court of Australia£59kawarded 30 Oct 2023
- Annual Web Content Manager licence Subsc ↗Federal Court of Australia£54kawarded 17 Oct 2022
- Renewal Software subscription ↗Federal Court of Australia£51kawarded 22 Feb 2022
- OBSERVEIT SOFTWARE ↗PSBA£66kawarded 30 Jun 2021
- IBM Software Subscription and Support ↗Bureau of Meteorology£18kawarded 15 Feb 2021
- Web Content Manager renewal ↗Federal Court of Australia£48kawarded 9 Oct 2020
- Software support ↗Federal Court of Australia£45kawarded 15 May 2020
- Web content manager PVU support ↗Federal Court of Australia£45kawarded 13 Mar 2020
- IBM SOFTWARE AND SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL ↗Federal Court of Australia£176kawarded 28 Sept 2017
- Software renewal Fed Court of Australia ↗Federal Court of Australia£166kawarded 11 Oct 2016
- TSM Remidiation ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£12kawarded 16 Sept 2016
- IBM Spectrum Project Suite, entry terrabyte annual subscription support & renewal ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£11kawarded 16 Sept 2016
- Software maintenance renewal ↗Family Court and Federal Circuit Court£137kawarded 3 Nov 2015
- Computing machinery and parts ↗Family Court and Federal Circuit Court£38kawarded 11 Nov 2014
- IBM Software renewal 2013-2014 ↗Family Court and Federal Circuit Court£260kawarded 15 Jan 2014
- Software ↗Department of Defence£17kawarded 18 Nov 2013
- Renweal of Software maintenance 2012-201 ↗Family Court and Federal Circuit Court£208kawarded 10 Jan 2013
- Renewal of software maintenance 2012-201 ↗Federal Circuit Court of Australia£48kawarded 9 Jan 2013
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.