Supplier profile
Ajilon Pty Ltd
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 7 Jan 2013 to 1 Oct 2021.
Awards won
1,169
all time
Attributed value
AUD 408.1m
as published
Buyers
32
public bodies
Active
2013–2021
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Services Australia | 260 | AUD 122.3m |
| Department of Home Affairs | 143 | AUD 46.1m |
| Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade | 110 | AUD 30.6m |
| Department of Defence | 105 | AUD 89.3m |
| IP Australia | 95 | AUD 16.3m |
| Department of Health and Aged Care | 75 | AUD 15.3m |
| Department of Parliamentary Services | 63 | AUD 8.3m |
| Australian Taxation Office | 39 | AUD 10.0m |
| Department of Social Services | 32 | AUD 9.0m |
| Comsuper | 29 | AUD 12.4m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 801–825 of 1,169 awards we hold
- ICT Contractor Services Panel ↗Department of Home Affairs£247kawarded 1 Aug 2014
- ICT Contractor Services Panel ↗Department of Home Affairs£220kawarded 1 Aug 2014
- Provision of a principal advisor ↗Australian Federal Police£87kawarded 31 Jul 2014
- Project Management Services ↗Department of Defence£218kawarded 29 Jul 2014
- ICT Contractor Services Panel ↗Department of Home Affairs£139kawarded 25 Jul 2014
- ICT Contractor Services Panel ↗Department of Home Affairs£209kawarded 25 Jul 2014
- Provision of Business Administration Services ↗Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade£188kawarded 24 Jul 2014
- Architectural Services ↗Department of Defence£231kawarded 22 Jul 2014
- Engagement of Business Analyst ↗Department of Defence£216kawarded 22 Jul 2014
- Technical Architect Services ↗Department of Defence£445kawarded 22 Jul 2014
- Architectural Services ↗Department of Defence£381kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Engagement of Business Analyst ↗Department of Defence£440kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Technical Architect Services ↗Department of Defence£668kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Technical Architect Services ↗Department of Defence£890kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Provision of IT architect services ↗Australian Federal Police£272kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Provision of IT architect services ↗Australian Federal Police£553kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Provision of business analyst services ↗Australian Federal Police£247kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Provision of business analyst services ↗Australian Federal Police£363kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Provision of business analyst services ↗Australian Federal Police£520kawarded 21 Jul 2014
- Labour Hire - ICT Contractor ↗Department of Health and Aged Care£312kawarded 18 Jul 2014
- ICT Contractor Services Panel ↗Department of Home Affairs£297kawarded 11 Jul 2014
- ICT Contractor Services Panel ↗Department of Home Affairs£251kawarded 11 Jul 2014
- Labour Hire - ICT Contractor ↗Department of Health and Aged Care£251kawarded 10 Jul 2014
- ICT contractors ↗Department of Social Services£128kawarded 9 Jul 2014
- ICT contractors ↗Department of Social Services£258kawarded 9 Jul 2014
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.