Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 2776–2800 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002520ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£35kawarded 27 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002490ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£30kawarded 27 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002494ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£40kawarded 27 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002457ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£36kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002430ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£68kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002443ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002432ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002408ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£37kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002429ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002518ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£44kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002465ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£21kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002462ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£39kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002505ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002444ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£29kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002383ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£37kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002431ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£24kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002461ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£35kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002480ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002433ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£36kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002460ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002439ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002463ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£44kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002466ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002428ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 26 Mar 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Atth000001ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£28kawarded 22 Mar 2018
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.