Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 2826–2850 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002354ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£30kawarded 27 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002399ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 26 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002387ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 26 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002388ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£39kawarded 26 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002398ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£30kawarded 26 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002390ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 23 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002375ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£36kawarded 22 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002386ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 22 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 001590 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£168kawarded 22 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002385ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£29kawarded 22 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002373ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 22 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002370ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 21 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 001579 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£271kawarded 21 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002366ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 21 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002372ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£37kawarded 21 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002374ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£63kawarded 20 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002348ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£37kawarded 16 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002347ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 16 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002355ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£39kawarded 16 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002349ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 16 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002369ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£48kawarded 15 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002362ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£60kawarded 15 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002343ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£46kawarded 15 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002363ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£38kawarded 15 Feb 2018
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002367ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£35kawarded 15 Feb 2018
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.