Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 3226–3250 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000723 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£21kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000714 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£23kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000587 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000680 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000672 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£20kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000985 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£191kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000664 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£50kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000693 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£37kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000649 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£22kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000700 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 6 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000803 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 5 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000809 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£348kawarded 5 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000979 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£103kawarded 1 Jul 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000695 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£9kawarded 30 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000482 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£17kawarded 30 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000924 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£569kawarded 29 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000918 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£283kawarded 29 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000973 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£613kawarded 29 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000861 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£47kawarded 28 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000854 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 28 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000864 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£38kawarded 28 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000841 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£19kawarded 28 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000858 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£25kawarded 28 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000865 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£22kawarded 28 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000862 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£65kawarded 28 Jun 2016
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.