Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 3276–3300 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000825 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000652 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000845 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£13kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000828 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£25kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000766 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£39kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000653 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£68kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000751 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£27kawarded 22 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000643 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 21 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000636 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£248kawarded 21 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000645 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£19kawarded 21 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000644 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 21 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000630 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£44kawarded 20 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000632 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£27kawarded 20 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000627 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£35kawarded 20 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000628 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 20 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000629 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£40kawarded 20 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000558 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£36kawarded 20 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000619 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 17 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000618 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 17 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000616 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 17 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000820 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£40kawarded 17 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000611 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£377kawarded 16 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000818 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£209kawarded 16 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000697 Trans Start Dats Csa At Da W 70117 392 Will Be Disc ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£44kawarded 16 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000354 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£53kawarded 16 Jun 2016
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.