Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 3351–3375 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000469 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£40kawarded 1 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000368 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£56kawarded 1 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000052 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£22kawarded 1 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000390 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£488kawarded 1 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000248 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£17kawarded 1 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000451 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£38kawarded 1 Jun 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000396 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£32kawarded 31 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000431 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£50kawarded 31 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000561 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 31 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf For Other Functions B.2.2.1.3-8 Vs Conus To (Oconus&non-Domestic) Transport ↗Bureau of the Fiscal Serviceawarded 27 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000429 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£220kawarded 27 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000401 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£29kawarded 27 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000454 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£18kawarded 26 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000427 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£142kawarded 26 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000436 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£43kawarded 26 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000513 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£17kawarded 26 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000526 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£30kawarded 26 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000437 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 26 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000428 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£31kawarded 25 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000446 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£34kawarded 25 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000424 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£29kawarded 25 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000420 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 25 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000421 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 25 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000076 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£21kawarded 25 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000423 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£33kawarded 25 May 2016
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.