Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 3401–3425 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000247 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£26kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000323 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£61kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000285 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£40kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000246 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£129kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000334 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£36kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000332 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£28kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000169 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£15kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000196 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£1.3mawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000483 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£399kawarded 19 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000151 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£21kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000242 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£15kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000477 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£12kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxua000059ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£60kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000350 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£46kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000160 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£54kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000359 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£55kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000293 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£15kawarded 18 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000291 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£40kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000145 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£38kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000377 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£124kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002151ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£225kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000115 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£71kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000136 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£37kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000106 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£12kawarded 17 May 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000322 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£73kawarded 17 May 2016
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.