Supplier profile
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 15 Jul 2010 to 25 Aug 2026.
Awards won
3,798
all time
Attributed value
$6.1bn
as published
Buyers
78
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3037 | $771.3m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 172 | $2.0bn |
| Department of the Navy | 154 | $33.9m |
| Department of the Army | 53 | $6.2m |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 47 | $630k |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 46 | $303k |
| Department of the Air Force | 36 | $40.9m |
| Internal Revenue Service | 19 | $417.0m |
| U.S. Agency for Global Media | 13 | $30.0m |
| Department of Energy | 11 | $6.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 3501–3525 of 3,798 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000057 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£50kawarded 29 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000156 Trans Start ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£14kawarded 29 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000063 Trans Start ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£17kawarded 29 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000078 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£22kawarded 29 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000083 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£22kawarded 29 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000053 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£55kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000116 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£32kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000048 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£39kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000055 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£38kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxea002142ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£211kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000028 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£310kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000082 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£790kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000051 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£50kawarded 28 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000110 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£74kawarded 27 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000101 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£64kawarded 27 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000092 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£18kawarded 26 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000056 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£24kawarded 26 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000094 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£17kawarded 26 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000045 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£59kawarded 26 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000065 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£86kawarded 26 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000102 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£13kawarded 26 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxua000058ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£103kawarded 25 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000067 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£27kawarded 25 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000049 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£25kawarded 25 Apr 2016
- Igf::ot::igf Nxda 000079 ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£21kawarded 25 Apr 2016
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.