Supplier profile
AURECON AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 19 Oct 2012 to 7 Oct 2026.
Awards won
5,688
all time
Attributed value
AUD 5.4bn
as published
Buyers
68
public bodies
Active
2012–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defence | 5038 | AUD 4.0bn |
| Transport and Main Roads | 211 | AUD 542.4m |
| Seqwater | 67 | AUD 13.3m |
| Department of Housing and Public Works | 32 | AUD 3.1m |
| The University of Queensland | 30 | AUD 4.0m |
| Gladstone Area Water Board | 25 | AUD 2.0m |
| CSIRO | 23 | AUD 565.5m |
| Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts | 23 | AUD 6.2m |
| Queensland Rail | 18 | AUD 19.7m |
| Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water | 15 | AUD 4.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 3501–3525 of 5,688 awards we hold
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£479kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£262kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£185kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£278kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£267kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£284kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£110kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£313kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£407kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£264kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£87kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£32kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£101kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£77kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£471kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£424kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£107kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£938kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services Re-tendering 2012 - Request for Tender ↗Department of Defence£160kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£570kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£653kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Project Management ↗Department of Defence£412kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services ↗Department of Defence£126kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services ↗Department of Defence£171kawarded 27 Nov 2018
- Base Services ↗Department of Defence£211kawarded 27 Nov 2018
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.