Supplier profile
BAE SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA LTD
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, Canada, Denmark, the UK and the United States, from 11 Mar 2009 to 6 Aug 2025.
Awards won
4,450
all time
Attributed value
£1.2m + $76.7m + AUD 137.0bn + 1 more
as published
Buyers
17
public bodies
Active
2009–2025
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Navy Command Commercial | 3 | £799k |
| MINISTRY OF DEFENCE | 1 | £398k |
| Ministry of Defence | 2 | £39k |
| Department of Defence | 4354 | AUD 136.5bn |
| Department of Parliamentary Services | 37 | AUD 522.7m |
| Public Works and Government Services Canada | 25 | CAD 10.8m |
| Department of Home Affairs | 7 | AUD 995k |
| Defense Contract Management Agency | 5 | $25.5m |
| Department of the Air Force | 4 | $14.6m |
| Department of the Navy | 3 | $36.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 2151–2175 of 4,450 awards we hold
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£32.5mawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£29.7mawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£7.6mawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Aircraft servicing ↗Department of Defence£73kawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Hazardous material removal ↗Department of Defence£63kawarded 4 Oct 2016
- INSTALLATION OF NIGHT VISION CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT ↗Department of Defence£38kawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Specialised Training - Price Escalation ↗Department of Defence£29kawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Traffic Awareness System ↗Department of Defence£950kawarded 4 Oct 2016
- Aircraft servicing ↗Department of Defence£172kawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£7.8mawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Aircraft servicing ↗Department of Defence£137kawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£7.7mawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£8.0mawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£24.4mawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Threat Simulator System ↗Department of Defence£24.4mawarded 3 Oct 2016
- Ship Installation ↗Department of Defence£56kawarded 27 Sept 2016
- Phase 2 DMAP Activation Activities ↗Department of Defence£2.2mawarded 27 Sept 2016
- Pod Installation equipment ↗Department of Defence£12kawarded 27 Sept 2016
- Pod Inspection Camera ↗Department of Defence£14kawarded 27 Sept 2016
- Phase 2 DMAP Activation Activities ↗Department of Defence£3.3mawarded 26 Sept 2016
- Engineering Support ↗Department of Defence£134kawarded 22 Sept 2016
- Arms and Ammunition Accessories ↗Department of Defence£12kawarded 13 Sept 2016
- Systems Engineering Support ↗Department of Defence£86kawarded 13 Sept 2016
- Aircraft tank tail cones ↗Department of Defence£19kawarded 13 Sept 2016
- Training Delivery ↗Department of Defence£13kawarded 12 Sept 2016
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.