Supplier profile
COHERENT SCIENTIFIC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia and New Zealand, from 21 Jun 2015 to 12 Jan 2025.
Awards won
30
all time
Attributed value
AUD 811k + NZD 530k
as published
Buyers
6
public bodies
Active
2015–2025
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| University | 18 | AUD 481k |
| Department of Defence | 6 | AUD 131k |
| Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry | 3 | AUD 99k |
| Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water | 1 | AUD 100k |
| Landcare Research | 1 | not attributable |
| University of Otago | 1 | NZD 530k |
What they win
Awards
Showing 1–25 of 30 awards we hold
- Military science and research equipment ↗Department of Defence£17kawarded 12 Jan 2025
- Scientific Components ↗Department of Defence£27kawarded 18 Jun 2024
- Laboratory Equipment ↗Department of Defence£13kawarded 3 Jun 2024
- Scientific Equipment ↗Department of Defence£10kawarded 28 May 2024
- Laser Component Processing Equipment ↗Department of Defence£18kawarded 5 Jun 2023
- SPEX Spectrometer for Air Quality Monitoring - Davis Station ↗Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water£100kawarded 1 Feb 2023
- Nanomechanical and nanotribological system ↗University of Otago£530kawarded 17 May 2022
- Research Microscope Procurement ↗Landcare Researchawarded 21 Dec 2018
- Parts and service for Q Smart 450 laser ↗Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry£13kawarded 8 May 2018
- Provision of Quantel Q-smart 450 20 Hz Nd:YAG laser system ↗Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry£46kawarded 1 Dec 2015
- Laser consumables and service ↗Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry£39kawarded 1 Oct 2015
- Optical Components ↗Department of Defence£48kawarded 21 Jun 2015
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University£11k
- REPAIRS AND MTCE-CAPITAL EQUIP ↗University£11k
- SCIENTIFIC EQUIPMENT ↗University£36k
- MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CHARGES ↗University£24k
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University£26k
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University£19k
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University£58k
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University£61k
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University
- MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CHARGES ↗University£28k
- MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CHARGES ↗University£22k
- OTHER PLANT AND EQUIP PURCH ↗University£22k
- MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CHARGES ↗University£22k
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.