Supplier profile
CPM Reviews Pty Ltd
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 1 Nov 2010 to 17 Jul 2026.
Awards won
492
all time
Attributed value
AUD 14.5m
as published
Buyers
70
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defence | 69 | AUD 2.7m |
| Department of Health and Aged Care | 39 | AUD 1.2m |
| Department of Education | 28 | AUD 575k |
| Department of the Treasury | 19 | AUD 666k |
| Australian Electoral Commission | 18 | AUD 362k |
| Department of Finance | 18 | AUD 445k |
| Department of Parliamentary Services | 18 | AUD 384k |
| Geoscience Australia | 17 | AUD 512k |
| Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry | 16 | AUD 507k |
| Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts | 15 | AUD 454k |
What they win
Awards
Showing 476–492 of 492 awards we hold
- Code of conduct investigation ↗National Archives of Australia£51kawarded 2 May 2013
- Code of conduct investigation ↗National Archives of Australia£23kawarded 2 May 2013
- Code of conduct preliminary investigation ↗Department of Defence£13kawarded 30 Apr 2013
- Independent Conduct Assessment ↗Department of Infrastructure and Transport£20kawarded 2 Apr 2013
- Mediation by Independent Party ↗Department of Infrastructure and Transport£10kawarded 17 Mar 2013
- Provision of code of conduct investigation services ↗Department of Agriculture£12kawarded 1 Mar 2013
- Code of Conduct Investigation ↗Department of Industry, Science and Resources£24kawarded 24 Feb 2013
- Provision of Administration Investigations and Review Services ↗Australian Taxation Office£42kawarded 15 Feb 2013
- Human Resource Services ↗Productivity Commission£17kawarded 12 Feb 2013
- Human Resource Services ↗Productivity Commission£30kawarded 12 Feb 2013
- Investigation ↗Australian National Audit Office£23kawarded 5 Feb 2013
- Code of Conduct Investigation Services ↗Department of Parliamentary Services£11kawarded 24 Jan 2013
- Chairperson for Austrade’s Ethics Committee ↗Austrade£22kawarded 17 Jan 2013
- Chairperson for Austrade’s Ethics Committee ↗Austrade£11kawarded 17 Jan 2013
- Human resources services ↗Australian Competition and Consumer Commission£12kawarded 14 Jan 2013
- Review of Actions Independent Reviewer ↗Department of Communications and the Arts£10kawarded 7 Jan 2013
- Provision of Review, Investigation and Related Services - Panel Arrangement ↗Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorateawarded 1 Nov 2010
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.