Supplier profile
ESRI-AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 1 Jan 2013 to 1 Oct 2026.
Awards won
743
all time
Attributed value
AUD 626.8m
as published
Buyers
76
public bodies
Active
2013–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defence | 224 | AUD 383.0m |
| Department of Home Affairs | 50 | AUD 28.6m |
| Geoscience Australia | 35 | AUD 24.7m |
| Australian Federal Police | 31 | AUD 7.4m |
| Services Australia | 29 | AUD 4.8m |
| Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry | 26 | AUD 30.0m |
| Department of Industry, Science and Resources | 23 | AUD 1.4m |
| Bureau of Meteorology | 21 | AUD 17.6m |
| Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency | 20 | AUD 876k |
| Department of Health and Aged Care | 17 | AUD 5.8m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 701–725 of 743 awards we hold
- Annual software renewal ↗Department of Health and Aged Care£227kawarded 1 Jul 2013
- Annual Software maintenance ↗Attorney-General's Department£116kawarded 25 Jun 2013
- Software ↗Department of Defence£867kawarded 11 Jun 2013
- Software ↗Department of Defence£383kawarded 11 Jun 2013
- Software ↗Department of Defence£1.2mawarded 11 Jun 2013
- Software ↗Department of Defence£172kawarded 11 Jun 2013
- Learning service credits ↗Department of Defence£22kawarded 11 Jun 2013
- Server licences ↗Department of Defence£196kawarded 11 Jun 2013
- ArcGIS Software Maintenance ↗Department of Infrastructure and Transport£111kawarded 11 Jun 2013
- Writing Geoprocessing Scripts using Python ↗Bureau of Meteorology£11kawarded 6 Jun 2013
- Training Services ↗Department of Defence£99kawarded 5 Jun 2013
- Software maintenance ↗Department of Defence£303kawarded 5 Jun 2013
- Software Renewal ↗Department of Defence£404kawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Software Renewal ↗Department of Defence£69kawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Software Licence ↗Department of Defence£21kawarded 4 Jun 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£732kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£584kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£715kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£298kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£280kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£449kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£566kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£140kawarded 31 May 2013
- ArcGIS Server Maintenance Renewal ↗Department of Agriculture£439kawarded 31 May 2013
- Software ↗Department of Defence£48kawarded 28 May 2013
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.