Supplier profile
FUJITSU AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 9 Apr 2010 to 6 Oct 2026.
Awards won
4,972
all time
Attributed value
AUD 28.1bn
as published
Buyers
107
public bodies
Active
2010–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defence | 3175 | AUD 25.4bn |
| Services Australia | 474 | AUD 1.2bn |
| Australian Signals Directorate | 88 | AUD 58.3m |
| DOE | 74 | AUD 21.6m |
| Australian Federal Police | 73 | AUD 163.4m |
| Department of Industry, Science and Resources | 67 | AUD 100.8m |
| Australian Financial Security Authority | 66 | AUD 313.9m |
| Department of Employment, Skills, Small and Family Business | 60 | AUD 6.2m |
| Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry | 56 | AUD 74.7m |
| Education | 51 | AUD 1.2m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 2426–2450 of 4,972 awards we hold
- Management Consultancy Services ↗Department of Defence£280kawarded 26 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology Provider Arrangement ↗Department of Defence£3.4mawarded 25 Sept 2019
- Computer Equipment ↗Department of Defence£45kawarded 25 Sept 2019
- ICT Software ↗Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet£54kawarded 17 Sept 2019
- ICT Software ↗Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet£44kawarded 17 Sept 2019
- IT Specialist Services ↗Services Australia£332kawarded 17 Sept 2019
- IT Specialist Services ↗Services Australia£342kawarded 17 Sept 2019
- Contract with Fujitsu Australia ↗DoEawarded 10 Sept 2019
- Data Centre and Cloud Services ↗Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry£315kawarded 3 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£7.7mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£7.1mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£4.8mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£2.3mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£6.7mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£2.4mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£2.2mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£6.0mawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Provision of serivices to enable access to Bureau of Meterology database ↗Department of Defence£44kawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Contract with FUJITSU AUSTRALIA LTD ↗eHealth Queensland£33kawarded 2 Sept 2019
- Hardware ↗Australian Signals Directorate£91kawarded 30 Aug 2019
- software and support services ↗Department of Defence£27kawarded 29 Aug 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£5.1mawarded 29 Aug 2019
- Information Communication Technology ↗Department of Defence£36kawarded 29 Aug 2019
- IMPLEMENTING/MANAGING/HOSTING SUPPORTING NCPD SYSTEM UPGRADE ↗Australian Prudential Regulation Authority£2.0mawarded 27 Aug 2019
- Hardware ↗Department of Defence£28kawarded 26 Aug 2019
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.