Supplier profile
KPMG AUSTRALIA
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 13 Nov 2009 to 15 May 2026.
Awards won
2,544
all time
Attributed value
AUD 5.6bn
as published
Buyers
73
public bodies
Active
2009–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defence | 1712 | AUD 4.4bn |
| Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission | 134 | AUD 652.4m |
| Department of Social Services | 132 | AUD 40.3m |
| Department of Finance | 111 | AUD 178.7m |
| Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet | 60 | AUD 7.0m |
| Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry | 54 | AUD 7.5m |
| Australian Signals Directorate | 30 | AUD 104.0m |
| Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission | 26 | AUD 17.0m |
| Transport and Main Roads | 21 | AUD 92.3m |
| NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission | 20 | AUD 3.3m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 1951–1975 of 2,544 awards we hold
- ICT Contractor Services ↗Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet£211kawarded 21 Sept 2016
- Business Advisory Services to Comcover ↗Department of Finance£165kawarded 6 Sept 2016
- C2 Rationalisation Study ↗Department of Defence£984kawarded 6 Sept 2016
- C2 Rationalisation Study ↗Department of Defence£1.1mawarded 5 Sept 2016
- C2 Rationalisation Study ↗Department of Defence£1.3mawarded 5 Sept 2016
- C2 Rationalisation Study ↗Department of Defence£1.2mawarded 5 Sept 2016
- Research Services Review - Work Value Review ↗Department of Defence£79kawarded 30 Aug 2016
- DST Group Research Services Review - Continuation ↗Department of Defence£458kawarded 30 Aug 2016
- Asset Management Project ↗Department of Defence£500kawarded 30 Aug 2016
- ICT Remediation Project ↗Department of Defence£2.0mawarded 30 Aug 2016
- ICT Remediation Project ↗Department of Defence£7.4mawarded 29 Aug 2016
- ICT Remediation Project ↗Department of Defence£7.8mawarded 29 Aug 2016
- ICT Remediation Project ↗Department of Defence£4.2mawarded 29 Aug 2016
- Reform Program ↗Department of Defence£216kawarded 23 Aug 2016
- Business Acumen Development Program ↗Department of Defence£817kawarded 16 Aug 2016
- JP2060 Project Management ↗Department of Defence£1.2mawarded 16 Aug 2016
- Financial services to projects ↗Department of Defence£428kawarded 16 Aug 2016
- Business Acumen Development Program ↗Department of Defence£843kawarded 15 Aug 2016
- Financial services to projects ↗Department of Defence£900kawarded 15 Aug 2016
- JP2060 Project Management ↗Department of Defence£1.5mawarded 15 Aug 2016
- Business Acumen Development Program ↗Department of Defence£936kawarded 15 Aug 2016
- Scoping study ↗Department of Defence£158kawarded 9 Aug 2016
- Professional Management Fees ↗Department of Defence£419kawarded 9 Aug 2016
- Project Administration ↗Department of Defence£430kawarded 9 Aug 2016
- Professional Development ↗Department of Defence£125kawarded 9 Aug 2016
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.