Supplier profile
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across the United States, from 28 Sept 2007 to 30 Sept 2026.
Awards won
4,125
all time
Attributed value
$3.3bn
as published
Buyers
69
public bodies
Active
2007–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Information Systems Agency | 3052 | $1.5bn |
| Federal Emergency Management Agency | 472 | $103.9m |
| Indian Health Service | 67 | $4.2m |
| Department of the Air Force | 51 | $14.9m |
| Department of the Army | 41 | $7.9m |
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 40 | $597.8m |
| Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons | 37 | $297k |
| Drug Enforcement Administration | 32 | $991k |
| Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education | 24 | $897k |
| National Institutes of Health | 24 | $19.6m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 4001–4025 of 4,125 awards we hold
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000120ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£348kawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000121ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£519kawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000116ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£561kawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000117ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£2.6mawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000115ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£1.2mawarded 4 Jun 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000111ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£1.1mawarded 3 Jun 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000101ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£576kawarded 28 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000103ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£453kawarded 28 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000108ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£786kawarded 23 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000098ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£737kawarded 23 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000107ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£463kawarded 22 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000104ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£3.0mawarded 22 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Nxuq000011ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£227kawarded 16 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Nxeq000580ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£126kawarded 14 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Nxeq000601ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£148kawarded 13 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000102ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£586kawarded 13 May 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000093ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£1.6mawarded 23 Apr 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Qgsd000066ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£1.6mawarded 20 Mar 2013
- Qgsd000048ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£371kawarded 28 Feb 2013
- Qgsd000049ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£133kawarded 28 Feb 2013
- Qgsd000043ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£949kawarded 25 Feb 2013
- Qgsd000037ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£1.2mawarded 20 Feb 2013
- Igf::ot::igf Nxuq000002ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£23kawarded 29 Jan 2013
- Qgsd000004ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£536kawarded 21 Dec 2012
- Qgsd000007ebm ↗Defense Information Systems Agency£835kawarded 21 Dec 2012
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.