Supplier profile
MCGIRR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia and the UK, from 24 Jul 2013 to 25 Jun 2026.
Awards won
97
all time
Attributed value
AUD 53.5m
as published
Buyers
7
public bodies
Active
2013–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Fair Work Commission | 61 | AUD 23.8m |
| Administrative Appeals Tribunal | 14 | AUD 1.5m |
| Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions | 12 | AUD 25.5m |
| Administrative Review Tribunal | 3 | AUD 2.0m |
| Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal (MRT-RRT) | 3 | AUD 412k |
| Social Security Appeals Tribunal | 3 | AUD 235k |
| Ministry of Justice | 1 | not attributable |
What they win
Awards
Showing 76–97 of 97 awards we hold
- Software ↗Fair Work Commission£1.4mawarded 8 Dec 2020
- AMS Software Support and Maintenance ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£167kawarded 1 Sept 2020
- Software upgrade ↗Fair Work Commission£144kawarded 6 Jul 2020
- TRON Annual Support Charges ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£12kawarded 4 Nov 2019
- AMS Support charges ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£39kawarded 31 Jul 2019
- AMS Support charges ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£46kawarded 31 Jul 2019
- AMS Support charges ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£32kawarded 31 Jul 2019
- AMS Support charges ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£40kawarded 31 Jul 2019
- AMS Support charges ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£32kawarded 31 Jul 2019
- AMS Upgrade ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£146kawarded 6 Jun 2019
- Maintenance and support of AMS ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£164kawarded 5 Apr 2019
- Business Management Solution ↗Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions£3.1mawarded 17 Oct 2017
- Business Management Solution ↗Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions£1.5mawarded 17 Oct 2017
- Business Management Solution ↗Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions£3.4mawarded 17 Oct 2017
- Business Management Solution ↗Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions£3.2mawarded 17 Oct 2017
- Business Management Solution ↗Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions£2.9mawarded 17 Oct 2017
- Development of portal interface for DHS Project ↗Social Security Appeals Tribunal£122kawarded 23 Jul 2015
- Electronic Tribunal File (ETF) Development ↗Social Security Appeals Tribunal£50kawarded 23 Jul 2015
- Concurrent AMS Licences ↗Social Security Appeals Tribunal£62kawarded 23 Jul 2015
- Rebranding of MRT-RRT to AAT for eservices. ↗Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal (MRT-RRT)£16kawarded 2 Jul 2015
- Licence and Support - Commercial off-the-shelf Software, release version 2.3 ↗Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal (MRT-RRT)£44kawarded 24 Jul 2013
- Development of an e-services strategy, project plan and implementation including requirements analysis, scope of work, development, implementation, support and maintenance. ↗Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal (MRT-RRT)£352kawarded 24 Jul 2013
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.