Supplier profile
NetCom BW GmbH
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Germany, from 11 Feb 2015 to 7 Aug 2026.
Awards won
73
all time
Attributed value
€393.5m
10 shared, unvalued
Buyers
48
public bodies
Active
2015–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Komm.Pakt.Net - Kommunalanstalt des öffentlichen Rechts | 5 | €24.7m |
| Komm.Pakt.Net – Kommunalanstalt des öffentlichen Rechts | 3 | €1.3m |
| BLS Breitbandversorgungsgesellschaft im Landkreis Sigmaringen mbH & Co. KG | 2 | €21.4m |
| Gemeinde Berkheim | 2 | €5.4m |
| Gemeinde Dörzbach | 2 | €7.3m |
| Gemeinde Fichtenau | 2 | €2.4m |
| Gemeinde Fremdingen | 2 | €1.3m |
| Gemeinde Gottmadingen | 2 | not attributable |
| Gemeinde Haunsheim | 2 | not attributable |
| Gemeinde Kupferzell | 2 | €1.5m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 1–25 of 73 awards we hold
- Germany – Internet service providers ISP – Stadt Ingelfingen - Dienstleistungskonzession im Betreibermodell für den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes gemäß Gigabit-Richtlinie 2.0 ↗Stadt Ingelfingen€1awarded 7 Aug 2026
- Germany – Communication land-line rental – Betrieb Gigabit-Netz der BLS in Altheim, Bingen, Inzigkofen, Sigmaringen, Beuron u.a. - Cluster 1 ↗BLS Breitbandversorgungsgesellschaft im Landkreis Sigmaringen mbH & Co. KGshared awardawarded 1 Aug 2026
- Los 1 Altheim, Bingen, Inzigkofen u.a. ↗BLS Breitbandversorgungsgesellschaft im Landkreis Sigmaringen mbH & Co. KG€21.4mawarded 31 Jul 2026
- Germany – Internet services – Gemeinde Haunsheim - Vergabe Breitband ↗Gemeinde Haunsheimawarded 21 Jul 2026
- Germany – Internet services – Gemeinde Medlingen - Vergabe Breitband ↗Gemeinde Medlingenawarded 21 Jul 2026
- Gemeinde Haunsheim - Vergabe Breitband ↗Gemeinde Haunsheimawarded 20 Jul 2026
- Gemeinde Medlingen - Vergabe Breitband ↗Gemeinde Medlingenawarded 20 Jul 2026
- Los 1: OT Mödingen ↗Gemeinde Mödingen€1.8mawarded 10 Apr 2026
- Germany – Communication land-line rental – Betrieb Gigabit-Netz in Moosburg ↗Gemeinde Moosburg am Federsee€184kawarded 10 Apr 2026
- Betrieb Gigabit-Netz in Moosburg ↗Gemeinde Moosburg am Federsee€184kawarded 9 Apr 2026
- Los 1: Nordost ↗Gemeinde Ziertheim€2.1mawarded 23 Mar 2026
- Germany – Communication land-line rental – Betrieb Gigabit-Netz in Berkheim ↗Gemeinde Berkheim€2.7mawarded 19 Mar 2026
- Betrieb Gigabit-Netz in Berkheim ↗Gemeinde Berkheim€2.7mawarded 19 Mar 2026
- Germany – Communication land-line rental – Betrieb Gigabit-Netz in Aitrach, Argenbühl, Fronreute und Wolfegg – Cluster 1 ↗Zweckverband Breitbandversorgung im Landkreis Ravensburg€6.3mawarded 2 Mar 2026
- Los 1 Aitrach ↗Zweckverband Breitbandversorgung im Landkreis Ravensburg€26.0mawarded 2 Mar 2026
- Germany – Telephone and data transmission services – Gigabitausbau Gemeinde Schöntal 2024 ↗Gemeinde Schöntal€1awarded 17 Feb 2026
- Gigabitausbau Gemeinde Schöntal 2024 ↗Gemeinde Schöntal€9.4mawarded 17 Feb 2026
- Gemeinde Zöschingen - Gigabit-RL 2.0 (2024) - Auswahlverfahren einer Dienstleistungskonzession im Wirtschaftlichkeitslückenmodell für die Planung, Errichtung und den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes ↗Gemeinde Zöschingen€1.2mawarded 11 Feb 2026
- Germany – Internet service providers ISP – Gemeinde Mödingen - Gigabit RL 2.0 - Auswahlverfahren einer Dienstleistungskonzession im Wirtschaftlichkeitslückenmodell für die Planung, Errichtung und den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes ↗Gemeinde Mödingen€897kawarded 9 Feb 2026
- Germany – Internet service providers ISP – Gemeinde Ziertheim - Gigabit RL 2.0 (2023) - Auswahlverfahren einer Dienstleistungskonzession im Wirtschaftlichkeitslückenmodell für die Planung, Errichtung und den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes ↗Gemeinde Ziertheim€1.0mawarded 5 Feb 2026
- Germany – Internet service providers ISP – Gemeinde Zöschingen - Gigabit-RL 2.0 (2024) - Auswahlverfahren einer Dienstleistungskonzession im Wirtschaftlichkeitslückenmodell für die Planung, Errichtung und den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes ↗Gemeinde Zöschingen€1.2mawarded 8 Dec 2025
- Auswahlverfahren einer Dienstleistungskonzession im Betreibermodell für den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes gemäß Gigabit-Richtlinie 2.0 in der Gemeinde Dörzbach ↗Gemeinde Dörzbach€3.6mawarded 2 Dec 2025
- Germany – Internet service providers ISP – Auswahlverfahren einer Dienstleistungskonzession im Betreibermodell für den Betrieb eines Gigabit-Netzes gemäß Gigabit-Richtlinie 2.0 in der Gemeinde Dörzbach ↗Gemeinde Dörzbach€3.6mawarded 25 Nov 2025
- Germany – Communication land-line rental – Betrieb von Gigabit-Netzen im Alb-Donau-Kreis ↗OEW Breitband GmbH€14.1mawarded 19 Oct 2025
- Los 1 ADK Nord-West ↗OEW Breitband GmbH€49.7mawarded 18 Oct 2025
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative. Profiles may take up to an hour to reflect newly collected records.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.