Supplier profile
VIDEOPRO
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 8 Jul 2014 to 11 Mar 2026.
Awards won
165
all time
Attributed value
AUD 5.9m
as published
Buyers
17
public bodies
Active
2014–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Education | 64 | AUD 1.4m |
| University | 30 | AUD 950k |
| DoE | 20 | AUD 310k |
| Department of Justice and Attorney General | 8 | AUD 976k |
| DOE | 7 | AUD 128k |
| Griffith University | 7 | AUD 799k |
| National Anti-Corruption Commission | 6 | AUD 196k |
| Department of Defence | 5 | AUD 217k |
| Department of Housing and Public Works | 3 | AUD 582k |
| Public Works/Building/Assets/Infrastructure | 3 | AUD 41k |
What they win
Awards
Showing 1–25 of 165 awards we hold
- Software ↗National Anti-Corruption Commission£11kawarded 11 Mar 2026
- Contract with Videopro ↗Department of Housing and Public Works£297kawarded 30 Jun 2025
- Contract with Videopro ↗Department of Housing and Public Works£90kawarded 19 Jun 2025
- Audio visual equipment ↗National Anti-Corruption Commission£38kawarded 20 May 2025
- Audio visual equipment ↗National Anti-Corruption Commission£41kawarded 20 May 2025
- Audio visual equipment ↗National Anti-Corruption Commission£36kawarded 20 May 2025
- Audio visual equipment ↗National Anti-Corruption Commission£35kawarded 20 May 2025
- Audio visual equipment ↗National Anti-Corruption Commission£35kawarded 20 May 2025
- Contract with Videopro ↗Department of Housing and Public Works£195kawarded 7 Nov 2024
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗DHLGPPW - Public Works - QBuild£11kawarded 15 Mar 2024
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Energy and Public Works£14kawarded 16 Sept 2021
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Energy and Public Works£17kawarded 18 Aug 2021
- Contract with Videopro ↗University of Southern Queensland£75kawarded 21 Jul 2021
- Contract with Videopro ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£30kawarded 27 Mar 2020
- Contract with Videopro ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£17kawarded 5 Feb 2020
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£67kawarded 11 Dec 2019
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£183kawarded 11 Dec 2019
- Contract with Videopro ↗Griffith University£31kawarded 18 Nov 2019
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£139kawarded 15 Nov 2019
- Contract with Videopro ↗University of Southern Queensland£16kawarded 15 Nov 2019
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£190kawarded 15 Nov 2019
- Contract with Videopro ↗DoEawarded 29 Oct 2019
- Contract with VIDEOPRO ↗Department of Justice and Attorney General£156kawarded 28 Oct 2019
- Contract with Videopro ↗Griffith University£20kawarded 23 Oct 2019
- Contract with Videopro ↗Griffith University£47kawarded 16 Oct 2019
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.