Supplier profile
Wilson Security
Every public-sector award we hold for this supplier, across Australia, from 13 Jan 2013 to 23 Apr 2026.
Awards won
37
all time
Attributed value
AUD 51.8m
as published
Buyers
16
public bodies
Active
2013–2026
first to latest award
Awards by year
Who they win from
| Buyer | Awards | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Attorney-General's Department | 9 | AUD 5.7m |
| Administrative Appeals Tribunal | 7 | AUD 2.2m |
| Administrative Review Tribunal | 4 | AUD 7.1m |
| National Museum of Australia | 3 | AUD 16.5m |
| Department of Industry, Science and Resources | 2 | AUD 74k |
| University | 2 | AUD 44k |
| Bureau of Meteorology | 1 | AUD 20k |
| Canberra Institiute of Technology | 1 | AUD 200k |
| Department of Parliamentary Services | 1 | AUD 18k |
| Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet | 1 | AUD 13.8m |
What they win
Awards
Showing 26–37 of 37 awards we hold
- Security Services ↗Attorney-General's Department£15kawarded 22 May 2015
- Security services contract at Commonwealth Law Court building in Brisbane and Hobart. Lead agency is Family Court of Australia and AAT being a participating jurisdiction. ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£16kawarded 8 Jan 2015
- Security services contract at Commonwealth Law Court building in Brisbane and Hobart. Lead agency is Family Court of Australia and AAT being a participating jurisdiction. ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£16kawarded 18 Dec 2014
- Security services contract at Commonwealth Law Court building in Brisbane and Hobart. Lead agency is Family Court of Australia and AAT being a participating jurisdiction. ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£16kawarded 5 Nov 2014
-
Security services contract at Commonwealth Law Court buildings in Brisbane and Hobart. Lead agency is Family Court of Australia and AAT being a participating jurisdiction
↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£16kawarded 9 Oct 2014
- Security services contract at Commonwealth Law Court buildings in Brisbane and Hobart. Lead agency is Family Court of Australia and AAT being a participating jurisdiction. ↗Administrative Appeals Tribunal£16kawarded 17 Sept 2014
- PROVISION OF SECURITY SERVICES FOR THE ACT LAW COURTS AND TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATION ↗Justice and Community Safety Directorate£2.9mawarded 2 Sept 2014
- Provision of Security Services for the Locking and Unlocking of Gates and Toilets Canberra Wide ↗Territory and Municipal Services Directorate£1.3mawarded 5 Aug 2014
- Security Services and Equipment ↗Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet£13.8mawarded 30 Jan 2014
- Security Guard services for the whole of SSAT ↗Social Security Appeals Tribunal£46kawarded 13 Jan 2013
- COSTS TO COVER SECURITY LEAVE ABSENCES WHEN REQUIRED FOR USQ STAFF ↗University£44k
- SECURITY SERVICES TO SPRINGFIELD CAMPUS 1/7/13 TO 30/6/13 ↗University
Possibly the same organisation
These entries differ from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier, so they may be the same organisation — or a different registered company of the same name. They are kept apart on purpose: the figures on each page are per legal entity and are never combined.
Bidding against them?
Get new tenders in their space in a daily digest, scored against your own capability — plus the full notice behind each of these awards, with the documents and contacts it published.
Start 7-day free trialHow this profile is built
Awards are collected from official public procurement notices and deduplicated so one procurement counts once. Supplier names are grouped across their published spellings: case and punctuation are ignored, and “Ltd” is treated as optional because buyers routinely leave it off. Everything else that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, as are a parent and a named subsidiary, and none of them are merged here. Where another entry differs from this one only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier it is listed above as possibly the same organisation — a hint for the reader, never a merge: figures are per legal entity and never combined. Value is attributed only where the notice is explicit: the supplier's own itemised amount, or the whole value where they were the sole named supplier. Awards naming several suppliers without a published split are counted and marked shared, never valued, and a framework ceiling is never treated as money any one appointed supplier won. Sterling and euro are never added together. The linked source notice is authoritative.
Company pages are for organisations. If this page profiles you as an individual — a sole trader or an individual contractor — you can ask for it to be withheld: see how.