Skip to content
TenderGraph

Tender intelligence

Who wins Facilities Management public contracts — and for how much

League tables, spend trends and open opportunities computed from the official UK & Ireland sources — one procurement counted once, values as published in their own currency, every board dated.

Data to 25 Oct 2026, 06:45 · Methodology · Cite as: TenderGraph, “Who wins UK & Ireland public contracts”, accessed 25 Oct 2026.

Awarded value

£83.7bn

+ €2.3bn in EUR · excludes framework ceilings, amendments and out-of-scale figures

Framework capacity

£442.1bn

2,353 frameworks · ceilings, not spend

Awards

14,643

1,763 unpriced

Winning suppliers

11,190

named on awards

Buyers

3,463

publishing awards

Open tenders

10,387

£178.3bn + €34.3bn open value

Top-5 concentration

31%

of attributed value

Look up a company

Search your own company, a competitor or an incumbent to see every award they have won, what it was worth, and which buyers they win from — all time, free.

Awards over time

Monthly £-priced awarded value and award count in Facilities Management — read market momentum and buying seasons. Euro-priced (Irish/TED) awards count in volumes; their values are reported separately, never converted.

Monthly awarded value and award count, Oct 25 to Oct 26. Peak month £17.7bn.
MonthAwarded valueAwards
Oct 25£5.0bn258
Nov 25£3.6bn1105
Dec 25£5.8bn1139
Jan 26£17.7bn1206
Feb 26£4.1bn1240
Mar 26£12.6bn1966
Apr 26£2.6bn1131
May 26£9.1bn1164
Jun 26£7.7bn1463
Jul 26£4.4bn1340
Aug 26£3.5bn1103
Sep 26£4.2bn926
Oct 26£3.4bn602
Awarded value Award count

Top 100 winning suppliers — Facilities Management

Last 12 months, ranked by awarded value.

Top 100 winning suppliers in Facilities Management, Last 12 months, ranked by attributed value. Value is attributed only where the publishing buyer stated it.
#SupplierAwardsAttributed valuetheir own share
1Salterns Marina Ltd2£5.3bn1 unpriced
2THE MOUNT CHARLES GROUP LIMITED3£3.7bn
3SAVILLS CATERING LIMITED1£2.1bn
4Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited1£2.0bn
5Indra Sistemas S.A.1£2.0bn
6Cory Topco Ltd3£1.9bn
7FM Conway4£1.3bn3 shared
8Leonardo UK Ltd6£1.2bn1 unpriced
9Capita Business Services Ltd8£1.2bn3 shared · 1 unpriced
10SUEZ RECYCLING AND RECOVERY UK LTD40£1.0bn6 shared · 8 unpriced
11Boeing Defence UK2£890.0m1 unpriced
12STENNETTS LTD3£831.6m
13ALSTOM ENGINEERING AND SERVICES LIMITED2£814.2m
14Believ Limited7£759.8m1 unpriced
15BABCOCK LAND DEFENCE LIMITED6£712.4m2 shared · 1 unpriced
16Milestone Infrastructure Limited1£656.0m
17Mears Limited9£648.6m3 shared · 2 unpriced
18The Salvation Army Trustee Company1£640.0m
19EQUANS SERVICES LIMITED2£637.7m1 unpriced
20BAE Systems Surface Ships Limited6£541.0m3 shared · 1 unpriced
21MTC Definitive Limited2£539.1m1 shared
22VEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED27£466.2m8 shared · 6 unpriced
23OTIS Limited4£430.3m
24COUNTRYSIDE PROPERTIES (UK) LIMITED2£424.0m
25Serco Ltd6£395.4m2 unpriced
26FMG Support (RRRM) Ltd2£390.0m
27Kellogg Brown & Root Limited4£375.9m2 unpriced
28QWELLO (UK) LTD6£363.9m1 shared
29Rolls-Royce SMR Limited1£359.0m
30BIFFA MUNICIPAL LIMITED1£348.6m
31OCS Technical Services Ltd4£325.0m2 shared
32M Group Highways Ltd.4£317.8m1 shared · 1 unpriced
33Urban Fox Networks (Kent) Limited2£290.0m1 unpriced
34GRAHAM ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED8£284.7m5 shared · 1 unpriced
35CHAR.GY LIMITED10£275.4m4 shared · 1 unpriced
36Egis Projects UK Ltd2£266.5m
37STADLER RAIL SERVICE UK LIMITED2£261.6m
38NETCOMPANY UK LIMITED2£245.2m1 unpriced
39Shaw Healthcare Group Ltd2£240.0m1 shared
40W&S Waste Management Ltd2£236.0m
41Lockheed Martin UK Ltd3£234.6m
42FCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITED3£222.1m1 shared · 1 unpriced
43WATES CONSTRUCTION LIMITED2£209.3m1 shared
44Vard Group AS1£193.3m
45Airbus Military Sociedad Limitada (AMSL) [Airbus Defence and Space Limited]1£189.8m
46DAVITA (UK) LIMITED1£189.1m
47Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited6£181.1m1 shared · 2 unpriced
48COMPASS CONTRACT SERVICES (U.K.) LIMITED20£179.1m6 shared · 1 unpriced
49STERIS Instrument Processing2£170.0m
50ASPENS-SERVICES LIMITED21£169.4m3 shared · 1 unpriced
51SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED1£158.2m
52Babcock Integrated Technology Limited3£154.4m
53Marlborough Highways1£150.0m
54Sports and Leisure Management Ltd1£148.0m
55MEDEQUIP ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED4£147.0m
56OneView Commerce, Inc.1£141.0m
57ISS MEDICLEAN LIMITED3£140.0m1 shared · 1 unpriced
58MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED3£137.1m
59Equans E&S Solutions Limited1£128.0m
60Equans EandS Solutions Limited1£128.0m
61Cruden Homes Ltd1£126.5m
62CARDO (CENTRAL) LIMITED1£125.0m
63GUNWHARF QUAYS LIMITED1£106.0m
64Vodafone Limited4£104.9m1 unpriced
65SCHINDLER LTD4£103.4m1 shared
66M Group Transport (Rail and Aviation) Ltd1£99.2m
67Plug Charging Ltd1£94.9m
68Prosci Uk Ltd2£91.8m1 unpriced
69COUNTRYSTYLE RECYCLING LIMITED9£90.3m3 shared · 1 unpriced
70Axis Europe Limited3£90.0m2 shared
71Perk UK Ltd2£90.0m1 shared
72WILLIAM GILDER LIMITED1£90.0m
73UK Docks Marine Services North Ltd7£85.5m3 unpriced
74FIBRUS LTD2£81.0m1 shared
75Glendale Countryside Ltd28£80.1m11 shared · 4 unpriced
76GB ELECTRICAL SERVICES (SOUTH EAST) LLP1£77.4m
77CLEAR PATH HOMES LIMITED2£73.8m1 shared
78Sea Tec UK Ltd2£71.2m
79Cleshar Contract Services Limited4£67.7m1 shared · 1 unpriced
80CAF RAIL UK LIMITED2£66.1m
81Wrights of Twycross Ltd4£66.0m3 shared
82CHURCHILL CONTRACT SERVICES LIMITED22£66.0m6 shared · 1 unpriced
83St Mungo's7£65.6m
84Innovate Services Ltd14£65.5m3 unpriced
85SURESERVE COMPLIANCE SOUTH LIMITED4£65.0m3 shared
86RVL Aviation Limited1£64.4m
87CLC Contractors Ltd19£64.0m5 shared
88Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land Ltd1£63.3m
89EZ Charge Limited4£61.6m
90Mellors Catering Services7£60.6m1 shared
91VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES GROUP (UK) LIMITED1£59.4m
92TAYLOR SHAW LIMITED7£57.6m2 shared
93Wates Property Services Limited7£56.7m5 shared · 1 unpriced
94MITIE CLEANING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED4£56.4m1 unpriced
95N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED3£55.3m
96Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd4£55.0m2 unpriced
97H W MARTIN WASTE LIMITED6£53.1m
98JFD Limited1£52.3m
99Plantexpand Ltd6£51.9m2 shared
100FCC ENVIRONMENT (UK) LIMITED4£51.4m1 shared

Attributed value is what the notice says this supplier won: their itemised share where the buyer published one, the full value where they were the only supplier named. Awards naming several suppliers without a split are counted as shared and left unvalued — we never divide a framework ceiling by the number of winners.

Click a supplier to see their full award history — free. Search, monitors and the API are part of the free trial.

Biggest open tenders — Facilities Management

Latest awards — Facilities Management

Turn intelligence into pipeline

Search every notice, monitor your market, qualify bids against your own profile, and plug it all into Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity or Grok. 7-day free trial, cancel any time.

Start free trial

Methodology

Built from official notices published on Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales, TED, eTenders Ireland, NHS Atamis and the major procurement portal families, under their open licences. Notices describing the same procurement are collapsed to one canonical record before counting.

What a supplier is credited with. Only a value the publishing buyer stated was theirs: their own itemised amount, or the whole contract value where they were the single named supplier. Three things are therefore counted but never valued — an award naming several suppliers with no published split, a framework ceiling restated across the suppliers appointed to it, and an award notice that names a winner without publishing what they won (there, the figure on the notice is the pre-award estimate, not an outcome). Nothing is split evenly and nothing is estimated, so a £60m framework with ten winners never becomes £600m — and equally, these boards understate any supplier whose buyers publish vaguely.

What a total leaves out. Two things are published as awards but are not new money, and adding them counts a contract twice. A contract amendment republishes the whole value of a contract already awarded — one NHS commissioner issues one each time a block contract changes, and thirty-three of them named a single hospital trust. And a figure so far out of scale with everything its own buyer has ever awarded that it cannot be a contract that buyer placed — a debris-removal research service published at £61bn, a thousand times its department's entire history. Both are kept on the notice exactly as published, with the link to prove it, because that is what the buyer said. Neither is added to a total, because a total is our claim rather than theirs.

How companies are grouped. A company's published spellings are grouped together: case, punctuation and the optional “Ltd” are ignored. Anything that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, and a parent is never rolled up with a named subsidiary. Where the rule is arguable we split rather than merge, because showing a firm fewer of its own awards is a smaller error than publishing someone else's under its name. Where two rows on a board differ only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier — “Northgate Civils Ltd” beside “Northgate Civils (UK) Ltd” — a chip marks each as possibly the same organisation. That is a hint for the reader, not a merge: the rows keep their own ranks and their values are never combined.

Frameworks. A framework's published value is a ceiling — the maximum that may be called off over its life, not money awarded — so it is reported as capacity, separately, and never added to awarded value. One Crown Commercial Service framework alone states £120bn; counting ceilings as spend put £1,660bn on this page for a twelve-month window of a market that spends around £400bn a year. Where a buyer publishes what an individual supplier was actually allocated under a framework, that allocation IS counted for them — which is why the supplier column can exceed awarded value on a sector heavy in frameworks.

Currency, dates and sectors. Sterling and euro are never summed or converted — league tables rank on £-priced value with € shown alongside, and where a publisher omits the currency it is read from the country of the notice. Award dates use the published award date, falling back to notice publication. A sector filter is inclusive (a notice appears if any of its CPV codes belong to that sector); a company's own sector split files each award once, under the division most of its codes belong to, so the split sums to their total. The linked source notice remains authoritative for every record.

Frequently asked

Where does this data come from?
Every official UK and Ireland publication surface we ingest: Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales, TED, eTenders Ireland, NHS Atamis and the major portal families — deduplicated so one procurement counts once, with the source linked on every record.
How often does it update?
Each source is collected on its own schedule, and these tables are recomputed from the full store out of band rather than on each visit. The 'Data to' line above states exactly when the numbers you are reading were taken, and the coverage page shows when each source last synced successfully — if collection has paused, that is where it shows.
Why do some awards show no value?
Not every award notice publishes a contract value. Unpriced awards still count in the volume columns, and each table states how many rows were unpriced — we never estimate or infer values.
A supplier I know won a big framework shows a small value — why?
Because the notice didn't say what their share was. When an award names several suppliers without publishing a split, we count it against each of them but attribute no value — dividing a framework ceiling between winners would be a guess. Those awards appear in the 'shared' count next to the value.
Are supplier names grouped by parent company?
No. A company's own published spellings are grouped — case, punctuation and an optional “Ltd” — but a group and its named subsidiaries stay separate, as do an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta of the same name, because those are different registered organisations bidding for different work. Where the rule is arguable we split rather than merge: showing a firm fewer of its own awards is a smaller error than publishing another firm's awards under its name. Rows that differ only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier carry a “possibly the same as” chip so you can see the split; their values are never combined.