Skip to content
TenderGraph

Tender intelligence

Who wins UK & Ireland public contracts — and for how much

League tables, spend trends and open opportunities computed from the official UK & Ireland sources — one procurement counted once, values as published in their own currency, every board dated.

Data to 25 Oct 2026, 06:35 · Methodology · Cite as: TenderGraph, “Who wins UK & Ireland public contracts”, accessed 25 Oct 2026.

Awarded value

£355.8bn

+ €3.3bn in EUR · excludes framework ceilings, amendments and out-of-scale figures

Framework capacity

£498.9bn

9,105 frameworks · ceilings, not spend

Awards

46,868

5,461 unpriced

Winning suppliers

25,864

named on awards

Buyers

4,366

publishing awards

Open tenders

39,966

£452.7bn + €75.0bn open value

Top-5 concentration

54%

of attributed value

Look up a company

Search your own company, a competitor or an incumbent to see every award they have won, what it was worth, and which buyers they win from — all time, free.

Awards over time

Monthly £-priced awarded value and award count — read market momentum and buying seasons. Euro-priced (Irish/TED) awards count in volumes; their values are reported separately, never converted.

Monthly awarded value and award count, Apr 26 to Oct 26. Peak month £106.2bn.
MonthAwarded valueAwards
Apr 26£3.4bn2194
May 26£23.4bn7740
Jun 26£42.1bn9071
Jul 26£32.8bn9416
Aug 26£79.5bn8074
Sep 26£106.2bn6309
Oct 26£68.5bn4064
Awarded value Award count

Where the money went

Top 100 winning suppliers

Last 6 months, ranked by awarded value.

Top 100 winning suppliers across all sectors, Last 6 months, ranked by attributed value. Value is attributed only where the publishing buyer stated it.
#SupplierAwardsAttributed valuetheir own share
1CLEARSPACE TODAY LTD2£61.3bn1 unpriced
2Orano Limited5£10.0bn2 shared
3Barts Health NHS Trust​1£6.3bn
4HEAT NETWORKS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY NO.1 LIMITED2£3.9bn
5HEMIKO LIMITED1£3.4bn
6Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1£2.9bn
7SAVILLS CATERING LIMITED1£2.1bn
8Raytheon Systems UK1£1.9bn
9HILL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED1£1.9bn
10Saab UK3£1.6bn1 unpriced
11Ashford & St Peters Hospital NHS Foundation Trust1£1.5bn
12James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1£1.5bn
13Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1£1.4bn
14The UK Recruitment Co Ltd1£1.3bn
15Alstom Engineering and Services Limited3£1.3bn1 unpriced
16FM Conway Ltd18£1.3bn2 shared · 14 unpriced
17Capita Business Services Ltd17£1.2bn5 shared · 4 unpriced
18VITAL ENERGI UTILITIES LIMITED5£1.1bn1 shared · 1 unpriced
19The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust1£1.1bn
20Rock Rail TPE Plc2£1.1bn1 unpriced
21Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust3£1.1bn2 unpriced
22Angel Trains Rolling Stock Limited1£1.0bn
23ENGIE POWER LIMITED1£950.0m
24BALFOUR BEATTY LIVING PLACES LIMITED1£900.0m
25SUEZ RECYCLING AND RECOVERY UK LTD10£865.6m2 shared
26STENNETTS LTD2£831.6m
27Believ Limited7£759.8m1 unpriced
28EQUANS SERVICES LIMITED4£649.0m
29The Salvation Army Trustee Company2£640.9m
30BAE Systems Surface Ships Ltd4£541.0m2 shared
31MTC Definitive Limited2£539.1m1 shared
32LOCKHEED MARTIN1£512.6m
33DHL SUPPLY CHAIN LIMITED4£504.3m1 shared · 1 unpriced
34ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED4£450.8m1 shared · 1 unpriced
35BAE Surface Ships1£450.6m
36UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON10£401.1m2 unpriced
37OCS Technical Services Ltd7£396.1m2 shared · 1 unpriced
38LGC LIMITED12£391.0m3 unpriced
39Kellogg Brown & Root Limited3£375.9m1 unpriced
40VEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED10£375.4m4 shared · 1 unpriced
41BIFFA MUNICIPAL LIMITED2£348.7m
42Tekever Ltd1£336.7m
43Char.gy Limited4£315.8m1 unpriced
44Nationwide Coaches1£300.0m
45Mears Group1£290.0m
46North Staffs Combined Healthcare NHS Trust1£277.9m
47LCC POWER LIMITED1£275.5m
48STADLER RAIL SERVICE UK LIMITED3£261.9m
49HATS Group Limited11£260.8m7 shared
50FAIRGATE TOTTENHAM LIMITED1£260.0m
513TPOWER LTD1£258.5m
52FIRST WEST YORKSHIRE LIMITED1£253.0m
53HOCHTIEF DATA CENTRE PARTNER UK LTD1£250.0m
54LCC Group Ltd3£245.0m2 unpriced
55Courtesy Cars Redhill Ltd50£236.7m3 shared
56Places for People Leisure Limited1£235.3m
57Leonardo UK Ltd5£224.0m1 unpriced
58QWELLO (UK) LTD2£223.8m
59PORTERBROOK LEASING COMPANY LIMITED1£222.0m
60Roche Diagnostics Ltd23£220.3m + €40.0m2 shared · 5 unpriced
61Wates Construction Limited8£211.9m2 shared · 4 unpriced
62Cavendish Nuclear Limited6£204.4m3 shared · 1 unpriced
63Vard Group AS1£193.3m
64FMG Support (RRRM) Ltd1£192.9m
65Holyhead Marine Services Ltd1£192.0m
66Airbus Military Sociedad Limitada (AMSL) [Airbus Defence and Space Limited]1£189.8m
67Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited8£186.3m1 shared · 3 unpriced
68Whittington Health NHS Trust4£186.1m
69Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2£185.0m
70County Cabs Limited30£180.4m
71EZO Charging Limited2£180.0m1 shared
72STERIS instrument processing t/a Synergy Health UK Ltd1£170.0m
73SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED6£166.2m + €12 shared
74Softcat Plc211£162.1m + €284k24 shared · 97 unpriced
75LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED4£156.8m
76Marlborough Highways Limited4£153.7m1 shared
77Babcock Integrated Technology Limited3£153.0m1 unpriced
78Mears Limited7£152.6m3 shared · 1 unpriced
79Omnicom Media Group Europe Limited2£150.0m
80XPERT CARS54£144.7m2 shared
81Eversholt Rail3£143.2m
82Deloitte LLP46£142.2m9 shared · 23 unpriced
83OneView Commerce, Inc.1£141.0m
84King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust3£140.0m
85Aspens Services Ltd13£140.0m1 shared
86Cityheart Limited1£140.0m
87Kent Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2£139.8m
88Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust3£139.2m2 shared
89MEDEQUIP ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED4£134.4m1 shared
90LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST5£132.2m1 unpriced
91London United18£129.9m
92RVL AVIATION LIMITED2£128.8m
93Cruden Homes Ltd1£126.5m
94Nivo Mobility51£126.5m
95EQUANS Regeneration Limited17£126.2m10 shared · 1 unpriced
96Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering Ltd4£125.0m1 shared · 2 unpriced
97CARDO (CENTRAL) LIMITED1£125.0m
98Transport for Wales4£121.7m
99ROBERTSON CONSTRUCTION GROUP LIMITED4£120.2m2 shared
100Kier Construction19£120.0m5 shared · 13 unpriced

Attributed value is what the notice says this supplier won: their itemised share where the buyer published one, the full value where they were the only supplier named. Awards naming several suppliers without a split are counted as shared and left unvalued — we never divide a framework ceiling by the number of winners.

Click a supplier to see their full award history — free. Search, monitors and the API are part of the free trial.

Biggest open tenders

Latest awards

Turn intelligence into pipeline

Search every notice, monitor your market, qualify bids against your own profile, and plug it all into Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity or Grok. 7-day free trial, cancel any time.

Start free trial

Methodology

Built from official notices published on Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales, TED, eTenders Ireland, NHS Atamis and the major procurement portal families, under their open licences. Notices describing the same procurement are collapsed to one canonical record before counting.

What a supplier is credited with. Only a value the publishing buyer stated was theirs: their own itemised amount, or the whole contract value where they were the single named supplier. Three things are therefore counted but never valued — an award naming several suppliers with no published split, a framework ceiling restated across the suppliers appointed to it, and an award notice that names a winner without publishing what they won (there, the figure on the notice is the pre-award estimate, not an outcome). Nothing is split evenly and nothing is estimated, so a £60m framework with ten winners never becomes £600m — and equally, these boards understate any supplier whose buyers publish vaguely.

What a total leaves out. Two things are published as awards but are not new money, and adding them counts a contract twice. A contract amendment republishes the whole value of a contract already awarded — one NHS commissioner issues one each time a block contract changes, and thirty-three of them named a single hospital trust. And a figure so far out of scale with everything its own buyer has ever awarded that it cannot be a contract that buyer placed — a debris-removal research service published at £61bn, a thousand times its department's entire history. Both are kept on the notice exactly as published, with the link to prove it, because that is what the buyer said. Neither is added to a total, because a total is our claim rather than theirs.

How companies are grouped. A company's published spellings are grouped together: case, punctuation and the optional “Ltd” are ignored. Anything that marks a different organisation is kept — an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta are separate businesses from a Ltd of the same name, and a parent is never rolled up with a named subsidiary. Where the rule is arguable we split rather than merge, because showing a firm fewer of its own awards is a smaller error than publishing someone else's under its name. Where two rows on a board differ only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier — “Northgate Civils Ltd” beside “Northgate Civils (UK) Ltd” — a chip marks each as possibly the same organisation. That is a hint for the reader, not a merge: the rows keep their own ranks and their values are never combined.

Frameworks. A framework's published value is a ceiling — the maximum that may be called off over its life, not money awarded — so it is reported as capacity, separately, and never added to awarded value. One Crown Commercial Service framework alone states £120bn; counting ceilings as spend put £1,660bn on this page for a twelve-month window of a market that spends around £400bn a year. Where a buyer publishes what an individual supplier was actually allocated under a framework, that allocation IS counted for them — which is why the supplier column can exceed awarded value on a sector heavy in frameworks.

Currency, dates and sectors. Sterling and euro are never summed or converted — league tables rank on £-priced value with € shown alongside, and where a publisher omits the currency it is read from the country of the notice. Award dates use the published award date, falling back to notice publication. A sector filter is inclusive (a notice appears if any of its CPV codes belong to that sector); a company's own sector split files each award once, under the division most of its codes belong to, so the split sums to their total. The linked source notice remains authoritative for every record.

Frequently asked

Where does this data come from?
Every official UK and Ireland publication surface we ingest: Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales, TED, eTenders Ireland, NHS Atamis and the major portal families — deduplicated so one procurement counts once, with the source linked on every record.
How often does it update?
Each source is collected on its own schedule, and these tables are recomputed from the full store out of band rather than on each visit. The 'Data to' line above states exactly when the numbers you are reading were taken, and the coverage page shows when each source last synced successfully — if collection has paused, that is where it shows.
Why do some awards show no value?
Not every award notice publishes a contract value. Unpriced awards still count in the volume columns, and each table states how many rows were unpriced — we never estimate or infer values.
A supplier I know won a big framework shows a small value — why?
Because the notice didn't say what their share was. When an award names several suppliers without publishing a split, we count it against each of them but attribute no value — dividing a framework ceiling between winners would be a guess. Those awards appear in the 'shared' count next to the value.
Are supplier names grouped by parent company?
No. A company's own published spellings are grouped — case, punctuation and an optional “Ltd” — but a group and its named subsidiaries stay separate, as do an LLP, a plc, a CIC and a Teoranta of the same name, because those are different registered organisations bidding for different work. Where the rule is arguable we split rather than merge: showing a firm fewer of its own awards is a smaller error than publishing another firm's awards under its name. Rows that differ only by legal form or a bracketed qualifier carry a “possibly the same as” chip so you can see the split; their values are never combined.